home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac 1990
/
1990 Time Magazine Compact Almanac, The (1991)(Time).iso
/
time
/
071089
/
07108900.077
< prev
Wrap
Text File
|
1990-09-17
|
5KB
|
91 lines
BEHAVIOR, Page 56Is the Gay Revolution a Flop?A new book urges homosexuals to tone down and blend in
"The gay revolution has failed." To thousands of homosexuals
who marched last weekend in the annual Gay and Lesbian Pride Day
parades, the thought may be heretical, but it is exactly the
argument put forth by Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen, two
Harvard-trained psychologists, in a provocative new book, After the
Ball (Doubleday; $19.95). As Kirk and Madsen point out, the
revolution began 20 years ago last week in New York City at a gay
bar, the Stonewall Inn, when for the first time patrons fought back
against police conducting a routine raid.
The authors, both of whom are gay, acknowledge that
homosexuals' lives have improved since then, but they say the
victories are limited because America's fundamental attitudes have
not changed. "The gay movement hasn't got nearly so far as the
black civil rights movement," declared Madsen in an interview.
"Yes, our life-style is now `public' -- in highly restricted urban
areas -- but coast to coast, hatred and contempt for gays aren't
far from where they were 25 years ago."
In fact, the majority of gay men and women still do not openly
disclose their sexual orientation because prejudice remains so
deeply embedded in the U.S. About 25 million Americans are gay,
but society's institutions, from government to the church and the
press to advertising, virtually ignore their existence. "America
is not only reluctant to recognize news events or address public
issues concerning gays, it also refuses to educate citizens on the
nature of homosexuality itself," write the authors. Americans, they
hold, continue to harbor distorted perceptions. Among them: people
choose to be gay, homosexuals are kinky sex addicts and child
molesters, they are untrustworthy and antifamily, and they are
suicidally unhappy. Such social attitudes give tacit approval to
bigoted behavior, from antigay jokes to violence.
Kirk, 31, and Madsen, 34, put much of the blame for the
revolution's failure on gays themselves. The pair argue that the
movement for too long was wrongly focused on sexual freedom and
self-expression, issues that they feel have antagonized the public.
Instead, they say, the emphasis should be on civil rights and
fairness, concerns that appeal to all Americans. AIDS, which has
devastated the gay community, has helped shift the gay-rights
agenda away from liberated sex to more mainstream values.
Kirk and Madsen charge that the gay movement has been weakened
by its insistence that self-hatred is a basic problem. "Learning
to like yourself is an essential first step," Kirk told TIME,
"that's all it is." It does not guarantee that everyone else will
like you too, he notes. If gays are to achieve the ultimate goals
of acceptance and assimilation, they will have to overcome
America's hostility.
To that end, Kirk and Madsen assert, gays need to project an
unthreatening, respectable image to the straight world. They advise
curbing flamboyant excesses and keeping drag queens and butch
lesbians out of the public eye. Explains Madsen: "If you want to
stop the fire of bigotry, don't put it out with gasoline." The
authors advocate a calculated national media campaign using
clean-cut types, an idea they first suggested in 1985.
While praising the book's analysis of antihomosexual sentiment,
many gays reject its arguments. Self-acceptance is still a major
hurdle for gay men and women, critics insist. But they are most
riled by the suggestion that gays need to tone down and blend in:
that would slash at the heart of the gay-rights movement, they
charge. Says Sherrie Cohen of the Fund for Human Dignity: "We're
for embracing diversity and for protecting the civil rights of
anyone who is perceived as `different.'" Toby Marotta, a
sociologist in San Francisco, finds the book's thesis the same
"homophile argument used before Stonewall and abandoned afterward."
Some gays believe, too, that the conservative approach may actually
encourage homosexuals to remain invisible; the better gays succeed
in blending in, they suggest, the easier and more tempting it may
be to hide their sexuality.
Still, most agree that a campaign promoting positive images of
gays is a necessity. On the West Coast, the Lesbian and Gay Public
Awareness Project has run advertisements in the L.A. Weekly and
the Pasadena/Altadena Weekly. One of them shows a mother, her gay
daughter and her partner embracing happily. Reads the headline: I'M
PROUD OF MY LESBIAN DAUGHTER. In New York City last month, the Fund
for Human Dignity unveiled a model national campaign that would
feature gay-rights supporters in 60-second TV spots called
"Stonewall Minutes." In one sample spot, attorney Thomas Stoddard
of the Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund declares that "the
days when gay people could never be themselves, when gay issues
were never discussed, will never come again." That is undoubtedly
true. But most gays would also agree with one of Kirk's main
points: "Success will only come when we've managed to push up and
down to the other side the huge national rock of hatred."